The context
Beyond the generic principles of the design, we examined the integration of the ideas into a typical street scene:
Solutions for the typical street context
Around Stoke and Newcastle 19th century, byelaw terraced housing is typically floorplates of 4200 x 8900 with outriggers varying in size up to 5500 x 2500, arranged along narrow byelaw streets. The rear yards are almost exclusively hard landscaped and very narrow and overshadowed by neighbouring properties. Our generic solution is predicated upon the removal of all rear extensions beyond the main shell and the introduction of a sunspace extension angled to maximise solar gain and aspect for the householders.
Freeing up the rear yard,which in some cases can be 10m long allows for the provision of a patio, clothes drying lawned area and a shed for tool and cycle storage. However of much greater significance is the opportunity to provide 100% in curtilage parking, secure behind a gated alleyway or rear boundary wall. It is our view that terraced housing which does not seize this opportunity where it arises will remain unattractive to young buyers.
The layout above shows a variety of methods to accommodate such parking, but most rely upon the agreement of neighbouring householders and an investment in wider regeneration measures. In addition the narrow streets can often, as illustrated, provide parallel bay parking in conjunction with street traffic-calming and local pinch points. However terraced housing at 4200 frontages can never deliver more than 75% parking,and in some cases of two way traffic flows, it is less than 50%. Terraced housing varies in the extent to which it offers a frontage buffer zone, either as a walled garden, hard surfaced standing,bay windows, extended steps or in the worst cases straight in off the street. Our proposals provide for an option of a frontage internal lobby with double door separation to suit the worst case. Bay windows, raised steps, projecting porches and walled front gardens can be readily accommodated.

Leave a Reply